🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and parents are watching closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a growing number of states are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our kids' innocence". Legislation could be passed next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged parliament to approve a proposal raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended parents to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is given. Although it warns of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a useful first step," said one parliamentarian behind the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a future ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in strong research".

Last year, support gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the administration pledged to further research the topic.

Charities have raised apprehensions. An organization set up by the family of a teenager who was lost after viewing harmful social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is primarily unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures requiring parental consent for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various figures to mimic Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, other countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations strike a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The body notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

As this worldwide debate continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries show that policymakers globally are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.